RTVE intends to open an internal investigation to try to clarify the Corporation personnel who work in training academies, without requesting permissionand if people registered in them have been able to receive questions from the informant exam that should have been held last Sunday.
That is one of the threads of the investigation that is intended to be opened, as confirmed to EFE sources involved in the opposition process, who maintain that one of the hypotheses being considered is that the scope of the training academies could be “the circuit and the path” in which they were disseminated “the leaked questions.”
Furthermore, in the next few hours the RTVE Employment Commission will also raise a reform of the exam preparation procedureas was also reported this Tuesday in the Board of Directors.
The Council was attended, in addition to the interim president, Cascajosa Conceptionand the directors, some electronically, those responsible for Human Resources, Corporate Management and legal advice.
The procedure for preparing the exam is to be changed to avoid future leaks and, according to sources from the Corporation’s Board of Directors, it is being considered that each of the ten members of the court, which will be renewed soonprovide a certain number of questions, incorporate them into a machine and it randomly prepares the more than one hundred questions of the exam, which the tribunal will not see in any case at the end.
The new theoretical exam for the coverage of places in the RTVE Information and Content category, after the suspension of the one scheduled for last Sunday, It will be held next Saturday, November 2.
The test was postponed after the leak of some of the questions, a fact that the Corporation has reported to the Police and for which it has opened a investigation to clarify responsibilities and clarify as soon as possible what and how it happened.
The interim president of RTVE, Concepción Cascajosa, addressed this Monday those affected who called a protest at the Corporation’s facilities to ask for understanding that a decision had to be made to “keep the process transparent and on equal terms“.
